Forgot your password?



Back to login

Change in global diet, farming methods, to sustain environment
July 2, 2017, 2:06 pm
Share/Bookmark

More than any change in food production systems, it is global dietary shifts away from meat consumption and using more efficient farming methods that are essential to stave off irreversible environmental damage and increase agricultural sustainability, says a new study.

Researchers examined more than 740 production systems for more than 90 different types of food, to understand the links between diets, agricultural production practices and environmental degradation.

Using life-cycle assessments — which detail the input, output and environmental impact of a food production system — the researchers analyzed the comparative environmental impacts of different food production systems (e.g. conventional versus organic; grain-fed versus grass-fed beef; trawling versus non-trawling fisheries; and greenhouse-grown versus open-field produce), different agricultural input efficiencies (such as feed and fertilizer), and different foods.

The impacts they studied covered levels of land use, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), fossil fuel energy use, eutrophication (nutrient runoff) and acidification potential.

The University of Minnesota researchers found that although high agricultural efficiency consistently correlated with lower environmental impacts, the detailed picture was extremely mixed. While organic systems used less energy, they had higher land use, did not offer benefits in GHGs, and tended to have higher eutrophication and acidification potential per unit of food produced. Grass-fed beef, meanwhile, tended to require more land and emit more GHGs than grain-fed beef.

However, the authors note that these findings do not imply conventional practices are sustainable. Instead, they suggest that combining the benefits of different production systems, for example organic's reduced reliance on chemicals with the high yields of conventional systems, would result in a more sustainable agricultural system.

Interestingly, the team also found that a shift away from ruminant meats like beef — which have impacts three to 10 times greater than other animal-based foods — towards nutritionally similar foods like pork, poultry or fish would have significant benefits, both for the environment and for human health.

Larger dietary shifts, such as global adoption of low-meat or vegetarian diets, would offer even larger benefits to environmental sustainability and human health, the researchers added.

The scientists warned that a lack of action would result in massive increases in agriculture's environmental impacts including the clearing of 200 to 1000 million hectares of land for agricultural use, an approximately three-fold increase in fertilizer and pesticide applications, an 80 percent increase in agricultural GHG emissions and a rapid rise in the prevalence of diet-related diseases such as obesity and diabetes.


 

Share your views
CAPTCHA
 

"It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed."

"Envy comes from wanting something that isn't yours. But grief comes from losing something you've already had."

Photo Gallery